Skip to content
Search
Close this search box.
Genomics Education Partnership logo
Contact Us
Genomics Education Partnership logo
Contact Us
Home » Regional Node Event

Regional Node Event

GEP Regional Node Meeting Virtual

Midwest Regional Node Meeting – April 25, 2024

The Midwest Regional Node held a virtual Research Symposium for students involved in Bioinformatics research through the GEP on Thursday, April 25, 2024. Twelve faculty and nine undergraduate students were in attendance. The symposium included four research presentations from six undergraduate students. These presentations covered four different GEP projects: F-Element, Parasitoid Wasps, Pathways, and Puerto Rican Parrot. The symposium wrapped up with some time for faculty and students to socialize. The event was organized and led by Regional Node co-leaders Sarah Justice and Jennifer Mierisch.

The schedule of events and details of talks are listed below:

  • 6:00-6:10pm Welcome
  • 6:10-6:25pm Annotating rolled in Drosophila Species, Anna Pritchett, Marian University
  • 6:25-6:40pm Gene Annotation of ANO3 in the Puerto Rican Parrot, Delaney Hare and Mollie Hill, Marian University
  • 6:40-6:55pm The effects of sex, behavior, and age on an annotated novel gene G1-vHSPA5-B of Parasitoid Wasps, Katherine Muron and Jordan Nowicki, Saginaw Valley State University
  • 6:55-7:10pm Genomic Annotation of Drosophila willistoni Contigs 4 and 58, Zosia Bolde, Albion College
  • 7:10-7:45pm Wrap Up and Social Time

 

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

Due to a relatively low number of presentations (4), we were able to have students present to the entire group via PowerPoint on Zoom without separating into breakout rooms. This allowed for more questions from the entire group rather than hopping between Zoom rooms. The GEP provided all the technical support that was needed for the event.

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

We were hoping for more participation, so it would be good to identify why more people were not able to attend. We didn’t really have challenges in the planning or execution. We would like to promote the opportunity for students to socialize more in future virtual events.

GEP Regional Node Meeting Virtual

Pacific Northwest Regional Node Meeting – April 20, 2024

The Pacific Northwest (PNW) Regional Node had a virtual meeting on April 20th, 2024. The event included participants from four different institutions geographically spanning from southern Oregon to Southern British Columbia, in Canada! 

The event had two parts: student presentations and professional development for faculty. We had five student presenters: Taylor Evans, Amrit Singh and Dongliang Liu from the University of the Fraser Valley presented their annotation of F-Element projects. They were mentored by Dr. James Bedard. Alyssa Gerard from Southern Oregon University gave a presentation related to the Pathways Project, but focused on synteny analysis across multiple species. She was mentored by Dr. Nick Stewart. Natalie Sinclair, from Lewis & Clark College, walked us through her Pathways Annotation Report Form in a lab meeting style presentation and got very useful feedback from the other attendees to complete her annotation. She was mentored by Dr. Norma Velazquez. After presentations ended, the student attendees left and the professional development part of the event started. We invited Chinmay Rele, from The University of Alabama, to talk to the PNW Node faculty about micropublications and reconciliation. We learned about the microPublication pipeline in the Pathways Project and about the new plans for publications. Lastly, the Node faculty members stayed a few more minutes to brainstorm ideas for future events. We all agreed that student presentations are very valuable for the Node.

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

It is always great to hear students present their work. We organized the presentations by research project and we talked about having each student focus on what made their project unique as an annotation. This made each presentation different despite multiple presentations on the same research project. The presentations were very flexible in format, to decrease the barrier for student participation. We even included one “lab meeting” style presentation to get feedback from the group. There were good questions from attendees and great camaraderie and support for each presentation.

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

Invite more students that are not presenting to also attend.

Group photo of the Carolinas Regional Node Meeting attendees

Carolinas Regional Node Meeting – April 13, 2024

“Everything about the event was amazing.” This was how students from Agnes Scott College (Dr. Srebrenka Robic, GEP faculty) summarized their experience of the event. Srebrenka said that all of their comments were very positive. All reflected on how welcoming the symposium space felt and how easy it was to talk to and network with others.

The Carolinas Regional Node Meeting held a student-centered symposium on April 13, 2024 at the Clemson University Outdoor Lab. The venue offered a conference space (Kresge Hall) and lodging in cabins in a scenic wooded area. Those who had a long drive came on Friday, April 12, shared a great time together at Smokin’ Pig in Pendleton for dinner and stayed at the cabins. The event was attended by 70 people, 39 of which were undergraduate students (32 from GEP, 7 from Clemson), 11 were graduate students (6 from GEP, 5 from Clemson), 11 were current GEP faculty, and 9 people participating as panelists or keynote speakers.

Keynote Speaker

Robert R.H. Anholt providing an introduction to his keynote talk on "Drosophila models for substance use disorders”Dr. Robert R.H. Anholt, the Provost’s Distinguished Professor of Genetics and Biochemistry in the Clemson University Center for Human Genetics, was our keynote speaker. Dr. Anholt’s research focuses on dissecting the genetic architecture of behavior in Drosophila melanogaster, and developing Drosophila as a genetic model for identifying ensembles of genes that predispose humans to phenotypes including substance use disorders and rare genetic diseases. He gave an extremely interesting and engaging talk titled “Drosophila models for substance use disorders”. He presented and discussed results from genome-wide association analyses that have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with variation in cocaine preference, as well as results from a gene expression analysis of Drosophila lines reared on ethanol-supplemented medium.

Panels

Left to Right: Panelists Dr. David Clayton, Dr. Heather Flanagan-Steet, Dr. Aaron Masino, and Panel Moderator Dr. Trudy Mackay

Our first panel was moderated by Dr. Trudy Mackay, Professor of Genetics and Biochemistry, Director of the Clemson University Center for Human Genetics, and Self Family Endowed Chair of Human Genetics. Dr. Mackay and Dr. Anholt have a long, productive history of synergistic collaborations and together they lead the Mackay-Anholt Lab. The panel focused on Careers in Genomics and the three panelists represented a breadth of occupations and career stages in the field. Dr. David Clayton is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Genetics and Biochemistry at Clemson University; Dr. Heather Flanagan-Steet is the Director of Functional Studies at the Greenwood Genetic Center’s JC Self Research Institute of Human Genetics; Dr. Aaron Masino is an Associate Professor in the School of Computing at Clemson University and holds the Clemson University Center for Human Genetics Dr. Gary Spitzer Endowed Distinguished Professorship in Genomics.

The panelists shared their career trajectories, offered advice, and answered many students’ questions that ranged from the practical (e.g., do’s and don’ts of approaching potential graduate advisors) to the conceptual (e.g., how does one know if this is right for them?). Students learned a great deal about the multiple options available to them in the field of genomics, from academia to industry, from genetics to computing and bioinformatics, and more.

The second panel was moderated by Dr. Barbara (Barb) Campbell, who is the Dean’s Distinguished Professor and graduate program coordinator in the Department of Biological Sciences at Clemson University. This panel offered the perspective of recent or current graduate students in the field. It was composed of Jeffrey “Spencer” Hartfield, a doctoral student in Genetics in the Department of Genetics and Biochemistry and Clemson University Center for Human Genetics; Dr. Mark Loftus, a Postdoctoral Fellow in the same department; and Dr. Rebecca MacPherson, a variant analyst in the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory at Greenwood Genetic Center. Panelists were candid and honest in sharing their personal and professional stories, lending an intimate atmosphere to the event. Spencer gave an emotional account of his journey and the power of meeting people who believe in you and offer you unique opportunities. Rebecca shared her personal approach to work-life balance and Mark shared his enthusiasm for research and the realities of looking for a “real” job. 

Both panels were extremely well-received by students, some of which even stayed to talk with panelists after the panel sessions were over.

Student Presentations

The student presentations, however, were the highlight of the event. There were twelve posters and two oral presentations, one of which was a remarkably fascinating story by a group of students from Mercer University. The poster session was lively, interactive, and motivating.

We heard so much positive feedback, both from presenters and those who did not present. For example, Indi Bose’s students from Western Carolina University—having seen others and how comfortable they felt at the venue—wished they would have presented. One of Scott Tanner’s students at the University of South Carolina Upstate, who had only recently agreed to do GEP work with Scott for the summer, came to the meeting knowing relatively little. She came away with so much knowledge and was so appreciative of everyone’s patience with her. She was complimentary of all the students she spoke to, mentioning how they were able to break everything down and provide clear explanations. Srebrenka Robic’s students appreciated the chance to present and get helpful feedback. They loved the career panel and shared some insights from it with the rest of the class. Before the event, John Stanga’s students from Mercer University were worried, but once they bonded with their peers from other institutions, they became comfortable and felt like they belonged. After the event, John asked all the poster presenters the same question: what did you learn about yourself or about research by doing this? He heard many great answers: positive career decisions, the ability to overcome frustration and confusion, greater appreciation for what genetics is and why we should care about it, and feelings of belonging despite a disability, among others.

 

The very last event of the day was a short but interesting tour of the Genomics and Bioinformatics Facility at Clemson University, which was attended by about half of the attendees even though we were late on the schedule, and many had a long drive home.

The location of the symposium, in the western part of South Carolina, provided the added benefit of allowing us to invite colleagues from the Atlanta area in the Southeast Regional Node. This made for a dynamic, vibrant GEP community gathering.

Many thanks are in order. The first and biggest to our own Sally Elgin, without whose help the event would not have been possible. Trudy and Robert, as Sally refers to them, are her friends and colleagues and she reached out to them early, in July 2023. It turns out that they are very efficient and quickly organized a meeting with Sally, Marisol, Dr. David Clayton, and Associate Dean, Dr. Calvin Williams, to see if there would be any interest or capacity for this type of event at Clemson. Sally prepared some slides to introduce the GEP to our Clemson partners and Marisol explained the idea for the event—provide GEP students with the opportunity to visit a cutting-edge research center, meet with professionals, listen to research talks, hear about careers in genomics, and have student presentations. The meeting went well, Drs. Clayton and Williams were on board, and they even saw opportunities for their own students and faculty to participate. Many months and meetings later this came to fruition. Our most heartfelt thanks, Sally. And thanks to the Clemson University Department of Genetics and Biochemistry and Human Genetics Center faculty and students, in particular to Robert and Trudy. Robert was extraordinarily efficient and helpful along the way. In no-time he had booked the location and paid the deposit, putting us in touch with the Outdoor Lab coordinator. He also suggested the names for panelists and sent emails to the faculty at Clemson so they could recruit students for the event. Also, thanks go to Rooksana “Rooksie” Noorai, Assistant Director of Bioinformatics at Clemson University Genomics and Bioinformatics Facility, who stayed late on a Saturday to give us a tour of the facility. 

Thanks, of course, to the members of the Carolinas Node for your efforts in the planning and execution, and especially to Node co-leaders, Marisol Santisteban (UNC Pembroke) and Michele Eller (Southern Wesleyan University). Michele happened to be local and was able to iron out so many kinks and took care of so much stuff in person. Michele is the epitome of efficiency and organization. Thanks also to Indi Bose (Western Carolina University), Jeff French (North Greenville University), Maria Pereira (UNC Pembroke), Scott Tanner (University of South Carolina Upstate), and Vida Mingo (Columbia College) for coming and helping on the ground. And to those who could not make it but still sent their students, like Nicole Velmeshev and Cathy Silver Key (NC Central University) and Christine Richardson (University of North Carolina at Charlotte). And thanks to our Georgian colleagues, Srebrenka Robic (Agnes Scott College), John Stanga (Mercer University), and Pushpa Yadav (Middle Georgia State University) who answered our call and came and brought many student presenters. All those students were amazing helpers putting up and breaking down poster boards and easels in record time.

Our final thanks are to the Regional Node leaders, Mel and Jenny, for their unwavering support and the GEP staff, Sarah and Katie, for taking care of what seemed like thousands of tasks. Katie was recruited to help on the administrative side when Sarah was on maternity leave. Katie also created our beautiful program, provided helpful advice on planning, and joined us in person at the event!

The ability to have the event at an R1 Institution that has a center for Human Genetics and Genomics facilities was a unique treat. Maybe this model of holding Node events at R1 Institutions could be a modality for some Node events that would be cost effective. It is our hope that the symposium was also good for Clemson, in making the school more visible to prospective graduate students. If our Clemson partners were equally happy with the event, it could be a good prototype for encouraging more R1 Universities to host GEP Node events. Additionally, Dr. Clayton expressed interest in learning about the GEP materials and how they might use them in their foundational courses, to set the stage for the students to dive into the deep end of technologies and genetic data analysis. We will be scheduling a meeting soon. 

In closing we must quote Srebrenka Robic again, who—with a wide smile across her face—said before leaving: “When are we having the next one?”

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

This was a fairly large event with about 70 attendees, securing the appropriate venue was key to success. The conference center was the “right size” for our event, it did not feel crowded but was not ridiculously “empty”. Everything took place in the room, so there was no time “wasted” in changing locations: poster and oral presentations, keynote speaker, and panels. Even food was also served in the same room on a long table, buffet style, which promoted more communication. Posters were arranged around the room facing the center, except for the front, where the podium, projection, and table for panels were set up, and one side where the food was served. 

The conference center was part of the compound known as the Outdoor Lab and extremely affordable lodging facilities were in place. 

Because the event was meant to be a student centered mini-symposium, we wanted to have panels of experts in the field of Genetics/Genomics and a keynote speaker that would suit the most important members of our audience: the undergraduate students. We were fortunate to have the contributions of many professors and affiliates of the Clemson University’s Department of Genetics and Biochemistry and Clemson University Center for Human Genetics, including two persons that currently work at a nonprofit institute for medical genetics, the Greenwood Genetic Center, as well as a graduate student and postdoc who brought a student perspective to the field. This was made possible through a personal and professional connection of our own Sally Elgin to Trudy F. C. Mackay, PhD, FRS, Self Family Endowed Chair and director of the Clemson University Center for Human Genetics and Robert R. H. Anholt, PHD, Provost’s Distinguished Professor of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University Center for Human Genetics. 

The ability to have the event at an R1 Institution that has a center for Human Genetics and Genomics facilities was a unique treat. Maybe this model of holding Node events at R1 Institutions could be a modality for some Node events that would be cost effective. 

Finally, having to plan for this event gave cohesiveness to the Node (at least a fraction of the constituents) and a core group of people came together for several planning meetings.

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

We would have liked to work harder on inviting faculty from neighboring community colleges, or even high schools. That was within our plans, but we got consumed with the logistics and this went to the back burner and out the window. One member of the Node could just work on this effort.

We did not have much attrition but there was some. This was from undergraduate students, some presenting, some not. If we had to do this again, maybe we should include something in the registration that gives some sense of the commitment and the seriousness of registering to make sure that students know that last minute cancellations or no shows are really looked down upon and create much disturbance.

GEP Regional Node Meeting Virtual

Rocky Mountain Regional Node Meeting – April 17, 2024

On April 17, 2024, the Rocky Mountain Node held a virtual Regional Node Meeting. It was organized by Dr. Shan Hays and Dr. Zeynep Ozsoy. The meeting was attended by seven Node members and three speakers–two undergraduates and one graduate student. 

The first half of the meeting consisted of talks by undergraduate students who have been involved with the Tamarisk Beetle Project, which includes a genome annotation component that Node member, Dr. Amanda Stahlke, is developing for implementation by GEP members. Francisca (Frankie) Esquivel, one of Dr. Stahlke and Dr. Ozsoy’s students, gave a talk entitled, “Genetic Monitoring of Tamarisk Beetles (Diorhabda spp.).” Multiple species of tamarisk beetles have been introduced into invasive tamarisk habitat and Frankie’s work in an ongoing barcoding project has identified multiple unexpected hybridization events between the species. 

The existing populations of tamarisk beetles have expanded beyond the expected range, primarily through modification of diapause (an “actively induced” dormancy that blocks developmental growth of an organism in anticipation of a major harsh seasonal change, such as winter). In order to determine the genetic changes that have occurred in these populations, it will first be necessary to annotate genes expected to be involved in diapause. Emma Shelton, a former student of Dr. Amanda Stahlk, has worked on developing annotation processes for these species and she explained them to us in her talk, entitled, “Diorhabda Annotation Walkthrough Beta Version.” Genome sequences of the different species have been generated in different manners, so there are differences in the manner in which each species will be approached in the gene annotation process. Some tools that are common in other annotation pipelines, such as the Gene Model Checker, are not yet developed for this project, meaning that some additional steps are required with this process. 

In the second half of the meeting, Chris Schaaf, former student of Dr. Zeynep Ozsoy, and current PhD Candidate in the Sussel Lab at the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, gave a talk entitled, “The Role of NKX2.2 in the Developing Pancreas.” In particular, he focused on the cell fate determination pathway that leads to the endocrine cells of the pancreas, by using a NKX2.2 KO human cell line that he generated. He has found that NKX2.2 is playing a role in endocrine commitment and may do so through a novel manner by regulating metabolic flux, thereby affecting availability of acetyl groups to be used in the epigenetic modifications (histone acetylation) of target genes.

GEP Regional Node Meeting Virtual

Puerto Rico Regional Node Meeting – February 6 & 8, 2024

On the 6th and the 8th of February of 2024, the Puerto Rico Regional Node had a two-day Pathways Project training with Dr. Laura Reed. Node members met through Zoom each day from 4:30 to 6:00 pm AST (2:30 to 4:00 pm CST). Ten (10) GEP faculty and one (1) undergraduate student participated in the three-hour online training. 

As part of their GEP onboarding, all Puerto Rico Node members have been trained in the F Element annotation methodology. However, few have worked with other GEP Projects. During the 2023 Faculty Workshop, attending Node members expressed an interest in professional development activities that would help them acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to participate in other GEP research activities. A Pathways Project training was identified as a logical next step towards achieving this goal. 

The first session started with an overview of the overarching research questions, implementation ideas and an introduction to the project walkthrough. The second session covered topics such as common annotation mistakes, project claiming and submission protocols, managing report forms, and an overview of the microPublication pipeline. It also offered an opportunity to ask general questions and learn about different Pathways support initiatives. Members of the Puerto Rico Node have a special interest in the Pathways and Puerto Rican Parrot Projects and this training provided valuable knowledge and methodological insights that will serve them well as they venture (with their students) into other GEP annotation projects.

The Puerto Rico Node thanks Pathways Project Leader, Laura Reed, for setting time aside to train the Node members. A special thanks to the Regional Node Director and Co-Director, Melinda Yang and Jenni Kennell for answering many questions, sending helpful follow-up messages, and making sure the Node Leaders had the resources necessary to organize the training. Thanks to Sarah Potts for supporting the event registration, facilitating access to training materials and managing Zoom channel logistics. The planning of the training was a collaborative effort of the Node Leader and Co-Leader, Ángel O Custodio and Sheylda Díaz.

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

We had an online event during weekdays. This activity didn’t require organizing a venue or having people travel to the meeting location. It served our purpose well. Also, scheduling the training on a date removed from the beginning of the semester promoted faculty participation.

What lessons were learned from challenges in the planning or execution of the event?

Communicate often with headquarters or the Regional Node Directors before sending information to Node members. Also, remember that the Central Office will give the Node support with registrations and surveys.

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

Node leaders will write emails to headquarters more often to make sure they are not duplicating efforts doing some transactions that the Central Office can handle with ease. Also, they will set up a local checklist that will help plan and follow-up on certain tasks.

GEP Regional Node Meeting Virtual

Midwest Regional Node Meeting – February 1, 2024

The Midwest Regional Node held an online, professional development meeting for faculty on February 1st from 7-8:30 pm CST. The planning of the meeting was a collaborative effort of the Node, with special thanks to Node Leader Dr. Jenny Mierisch for taking a primary role in organization and participant recruitment. Nine current members of the Midwest Node attended, four of whom presented on different pieces or uses of curriculum. The schedule for the meeting was:

  • 7:00-7:20 pm Intro to HIV Curriculum by Don Paetkau
  • 7:20-7:35 pm Development of AI-Focused Curriculum by Ken Luzynski 
  • 7:40-8:10 pm Using R in the Classroom by Sarah Justice and Ken Saville
  • 8:10-8:30 pm Time for Socializing and Node Event Planning

 

Topics for these sessions were proposed both at the Node’s in-person fall meeting as well as a planning session that occurred in November as areas of interest to Node members. Presentations included faculty walking participants through the curriculum as well as discussions of how faculty have integrated these curricula in different classes. For anyone who is interested, a recording of the meeting and materials from the session can be found on the Midwest Node’s Trello card and in the associated Google Drive folder.

In addition to the sessions themselves, the last bit of time was used to discuss an upcoming student-focused virtual event the Node will be hosting in April.

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

Gathering contributions from Node members of what would be topics of interest as well as having different faculty present on interesting pieces of curriculum that aren’t traditional GEP materials.

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

Maybe consider a different time or recruit harder. 

Northeast Regional Node Meeting participants group photo

New England Regional Node Meeting – January 4-5, 2024

Eight faculty members, one staff member/TA, and seven students of the New England Regional Node gathered together at Siena College in Loudonville, NY on January 4-5, 2024 for an exciting two-day conference. Dr. Brittany Miller and Dr. Tom Giarla gave upper level course implementation talks entitled, “Using GEP Annotation Projects as a Launching Point for More Advanced Bioinformatics” and “Piloting the ZAD-ZNF Gene Family Evolution Project,” respectively. Dr. Rachel Sterne-Marr led a training session, “Wasp Venom Gene Annotation” and GEP TA and staff member, Logan Cohen, engaged us in a discussion, “Why students make mistakes: the underlying concepts behind common errors.” Five students from the Pathways Project presented in a lively poster session. 
Brittany Miller posing before beginning her talk entitled Using GEP annotation projects as a launching point in an advanced bioinformatics course
Rachel Sterne-Marr providing talk on PPT slide entitled Challenges: Incomplete Transcript Examples
  • Kate Putnam (Siena College, Giarla lab), presented “Akt and srl Genes.”
  • Forrest Veilleux (Franklin Pierce University, Page lab) presented “Glycogen Synthase in D. bipectinata: How Fruit Flies Store Their Sugar.” 
  • Caleb Casey (Siena College, Tom Giarla’s Genomics and Bioinformatics course) enlightened us on “Discovery of a Putative Paralog to wat in Drosophila willistoni.”
  • Chris Shulman (Siena College, Biochemistry course) gave a progress report on the wet lab wasp CURE (a collaboration with Lindsey Long, Marisol Santisteban and Nate Mortimer) in a poster entitled “Role of Glycolytic Enzymes in Parasitoid Wasp Infection of Drosophila: Heterologous Expression of Three Wasp Venom Pyruvate Kinases.” 
  • Tommy Anderson (Siena College, Sterne-Marr lab in collaboration with Nate Mortimer, Oregon State University) shared novel images from the SUNY Albany timsTOF MALDI instrument in a poster entitled, “Using Classical Histology and Mass Spectrometry Imaging to Study Parasitoid Wasp Infection of Drosophila Larvae.”
Members of the New England Node have a long-standing interest in learning R for their courses and research projects. The two final sessions, “An Introduction to R: Data Import, Simple Statistics, and Plotting” presented by Tom Giarla, and “Differential Gene Expression in R: Walkthrough of Primary Component Analysis and Volcano Plots” presented by Shallee Page, accomplished an important first step in getting the Node members comfortable working in the R environment and being exposed to very common uses of R for life scientists.
Shallee Page providing a talk on using R

Special thanks to all our presenters and other participants for making this meeting highly successful! Thanks to Melinda Yang and Jenni Kennel, the Regional Node Director and Co-Director, for perfectly scheduling the planning benchmarks. Thanks to Sarah Potts for taking care of financial logistics allowing us to focus on the meeting itself. Thanks to student participant Isaiah Korostil (Siena College) for facilitating during the R workshops. Rachel Sterne-Marr, Tom Giarla, Daron Barnard, and Evan Merkhofer all contributed to making this meeting actually happen.

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

The timeframe that was set up by Melinda Yang, the Regional Node Director, was perfect for prodding us to complete the various steps in a timely manner. Working with Sarah Potts to take care of financial logistics was such a relief. We are lucky in having two GEP members at our institution so the organizer had help in making decisions and on-the-spot problem solving (no lighting in the room we were having dinner!).

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

Have a detailed checklist for the week before the event to include name tags, poster boards, clips, maps, uploading presentations, and confirming times with caterers.

GEP Regional Node Meeting Virtual

Southeast Regional Node Meeting – November 17, 2023

On November 17, 2023, the Southeast Regional Node faculty and students came together for the Fall 2023 Virtual Symposium to highlight excellent student research in gene annotations of F-element and Pathways Projects. In addition, we were very fortunate to have as a keynote speaker Jason Williams of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory DNA Learning Center, where he gave some valuable insight into how his career came about in terms of computational biology, bioinformatics, and skills-based instruction and pedagogy with high school and college students. Jason Williams is also the founder of Life Science Trainers, as per a Hudson Alpha article. 

Many thanks to everyone for spending their Friday with us to share their work and ideas, we are looking forward to future virtual symposium events for more excellence.

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

Zoom was used to facilitate the event. Two breakout rooms were set up and students were assigned to one or the other. The schedule was sent out a day or two ahead of time, so that the students knew which breakout room they would be presenting in. Each breakout room was locally recorded and is available to watch on Box (contact Sarah Crocker-Buta for access).

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

It remains difficult to limit student presentations and Q&A to 5 minutes because of unexpected computer issues. In the future, Node organizers might need to consider having a moderator receive all presentations and share it on a working laptop for each speaker, in order to mitigate the technical difficulties. One breakout room had finished their presentations approximately 15 minutes before the other, which resulted in the guest speaker waiting in the main room for a period of time before the breakout rooms were closed. It was definitely a learning experience. 

Zoom meeting screenshot of six participants

DMV Regional Node Meeting – October 21, 2023

The D.C., Maryland, and Virginia (DMV) Regional Node held a faculty-focused professional development event on Oct 21, 2023. In this virtual workshop, faculty from our Node spent a half day having quality discussions about curriculum and pedagogy. Specifically, we walked through a curriculum developed by Dr. Rivka Glaser related to analysis of conserved domains. Portions of this curriculum were designed for intro level students, while others were designed for advanced students. This led to a conversation about course design for students at different levels. These active, hands-on discussions were capped off with a short planning discussion about things our Node would like to achieve in the coming year.

All participating Node members had a hand in planning the event, but special thanks goes to Dr. Rivka Glaser for sharing her curriculum, Dr. Christy Fleet for helping to refine our schedule and guiding questions for pedagogy discussion, Dr. Matt Wawersik as Node Leader and lead organizer for the workshop, and Sarah Crocker-Buta, Dr. Melinda Yang and Dr. Norma Velazquez for additional help with event planning. 

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

Node organizers began planning well ahead of time. This allowed discussion on what the faculty really wanted to talk about, and adaptation of the schedule so that the event could be pulled off. It also allowed for distribution of the workload. 

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

Not much differently for this event, even though it would have been nice to have more satellite Node members show up. This didn’t happen even after some individual contacts, and it made for a high quality and fun discussion with core members. For the future, regular events with a smaller/active group might feel repetitive if done without students, so alternating years with an in-person event with undergrads participating, and then faculty focused events the next year is a good plan. For faculty focused events, Node leaders might consider inviting another Node and have a multi-Node event to get insight from GEP members outside our Node.

GEP Regional Node Meeting Virtual

Pacific Northwest Regional Node Meeting – November 4, 2023

The Pacific Northwest (PNW) Regional Node had a successful virtual event on November 4th, organized by Dr. Norma Velazquez and Dr. Jack Vincent, Leader and Co-Leader of the PNW Node. Five current GEP faculty, 4 graduate students, and 10 undergraduates attended the event. We had 5 student talks on the F-Element and Pathways research projects. The talks were given by current undergraduates and recent graduates from Linfield University, Southern Oregon University, the University of Washington-Tacoma, and the University of the Fraser Valley, which is a great representation for the small Node that we are. 

The second part of the event was a graduate school panel, which started with an engaging introduction on graduate school myths by Dr. Nate Mortimer, from Oregon State University, followed by unstructured conversations between graduate students and undergraduate attendees. While the students talked, faculty moved to a breakout room to discuss implementation challenges and brainstorm solutions. We all reconvened in the main Zoom room at the end of the event to close the event and thank everyone for their participation.

What worked well for your event that might help others plan similar events?

The students gave great oral presentations and there were questions after each one. The presentations were bundled by research project topic (Pathways vs. F-Element), so there were similarities in the presentations according to topic. Yet, the several Pathway presentations all had their own focus on different aspects of the project, so they did not feel repetitive.

What would your Node do differently based on your experiences?

There needed to be at least 30 minutes more for the event. There ended up being  more student presentations than originally thought, which complicated the final scheduling. Getting a better idea about who will present before deciding the duration of the event would be helpful next time. The other way would be to cap the number of presentations, but it’s always great to have more students present and adjust the time as needed.